Association of frailty with clinical outcomes in myelofibrosis: a retrospective cohort study.

There is limited understanding of the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective cohort study on 439 chronic phase MF patients [mean age: 68·7 ± 12 years; median follow-up: 3·4 years (IQR 0·4-8·6)] from 2004 till 2018, we used a 35-variable frailty index (FI) to categorise patient's frailty status as fit (FI < 0·2, reference), prefrail (FI 0·2-0·29) or frail (FI ≥ 0·3). The association of frailty with overall survival (OS) and cumulative JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy failure was measured using hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI). In multivariable analysis, prefrail (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·5) and frail patients (HR 2·9, 1·6-5·5), those with higher DIPSS score (HR 2·5, 1·6-3·9) and transfusion dependency (HR 1·9, 1·3-2·9) had shorter OS. In a subset analysis of patients on JAKi treatment (n = 222), frail patients (HR 2·5, 1·1-5·7), patients with higher DIPSS score (HR 1·7, 1·0-3·1) and transfusion dependence (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·7) had higher cumulative incidence of JAKi failure. Age, comorbidities, ECOG performance status, and MPN driver mutations did not impact outcomes. Thus, higher frailty scores are associated with worse OS and increased JAKi failure in MF, and is a superior indicator of fitness in comparison to age, comorbidities, and performance status.

Shared-care model for complex chronic haematological malignancies.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of rare Philadelphia-negative chronic leukemias. Disease rarity has resulted in limited expertise concentrated in specialist centres. Patients are often referred to such expert centres for diagnostic issues, complex decision-making, access to novel drugs through clinical trials, and supportive care. Attending such appointments may increase financial and travel burden, increase caregiver stress, and negatively impact quality of life. To address this, the MPN program at Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Centre has implemented a shared-care model, working with local healthcare providers to provide ongoing management, and supportive care for MPN patients closer to home. This decreases patient travel burden, while maintaining high-quality patient-centered care. In this article we share our experience implementing the shared-care model. This model is potentially applicable to other chronic hematological malignancies and rare chronic diseases. The ultimate goal of shared-care is not to centralize care, but instead to build a community of accessible care for the patient.

Association of Factors Influencing Selection of Upfront Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation versus Nontransplantation Therapies in Myelofibrosis.

Despite the curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), a significant number of patients with MF do not undergo HCT. Factors influencing treatment preferences in these patients have not been well studied. This study was conducted to identify patient-, disease-, and donor-related factors influencing the decision regarding HCT in patients with MF. A secondary objective was to compare survival between patients who elected upfront HCT and those who opted for nontransplantation therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review amongst patients meeting criteria for transplant indication, evaluating clinical characteristics, treatment preferences, and outcomes. Of the 183 study eligible patients age <70 years, 129 (70%) developed an HCT indication. Age >60 years was significantly associated with higher rates of HLA-typing refusal (13 of 72 versus 1 of 44; P = .02). Caucasian ethnicity was significantly associated with an increased rate of identifying well-matched donors compared with non-Caucasian ethnicity (75% versus 48%; P = .02). Of the 69 patients with well-matched donors, 34 (49%) preferred to not pursue upfront HCT despite an indication for transplantation. Patient preference for nontransplantation therapies was the most common reason for declining HCT. We did not find any difference in survival between patients pursuing upfront HCT and those opting for nontransplantation therapies, although more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up. Patients of Caucasian ethnicity were significantly more likely than non-Caucasian patients to identify a well-matched donor. Despite availability of a well-matched donor, a significant proportion of MF patients with an indication for transplantation do not pursue HCT. Patient age, donor type, and patient preference play major roles in the selection of upfront HCT. Although a survival difference was not observed between upfront HCT versus non-transplant therapy, more patients in the HCT arm were in remission at the last follow-up.

The mutational landscape of accelerated- and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms impacts patient outcomes.

There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of mutations on outcomes in accelerated-phase (AP) and blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Moreover, it is unknown whether mutational status affects survival, as seen in chronic-phase MPNs. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated at our institution with AP/BP MPNs (N = 122; AP = 14; BP = 108) to comprehensively describe the mutational profile and correlate with clinical outcomes. Targeted sequencing with a 54-gene panel was performed. Forty-four patients were treated with intensive therapy, 27 with nonintensive therapy, and 51 with best supportive care (BSC). The most common mutation was JAK2V617F, occurring in 55% of subjects; CALR was found in 13% of patients and MPL in 6%. Thirty-two (26%) patients were triple negative. Other frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (30%), TET2 (25%), SRSF2 (22%), RUNX1 (20%), and TP53 (17%). Mutations in 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 genes were seen in 15%, 13%, 25%, and 46% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in survival between patients treated with intensive vs nonintensive therapy, and the benefit of intensive therapy was limited to patients who were able to undergo transplantation. TP53 was the only individual mutation to correlate with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.89; P = .03). In the multivariate analysis, mutated TP53, ≥4 mutations, low albumin, increased peripheral blood blasts, ≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities, and BSC were associated with shorter survival. In conclusion, mutational data enhance the understanding of patients with AP/BP MPN who are likely to benefit from current therapeutic options.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) - Part 2: A nursing guide to managing the symptom burden of MPNs.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare, yet potentially life-threatening, disorders caused by overproliferation of bone marrow stem cells. The symptom burden experienced by patients with the BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs (also referred to as the classical MPNs, i.e., essential thrombocythemia [ET], polycythemia vera [PV] and myelofibrosis [MF]) can be significant and can negatively impact quality of life (QOL). Since patients with these MPNs can live for several years, thereby requiring long-term treatment and follow-up, nurses play an essential role in communicating with these patients, assessing their symptoms, and educating them on treatments and self-management strategies that can reduce their symptom burden. This article, which is the second of a twopart series, was developed to provide nurses and other healthcare professionals with practical guidance for managing the symptom burden associated with the classical MPNs in order to help enhance their patients' overall health and QOL.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) - Part 1: An overview of the diagnosis and treatment of the "classical" MPNs.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare, yet potentially life-threatening, disorders caused by overproliferation of bone marrow stem cells. The symptom burden experienced by patients with the BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs (also referred to as the classical MPNs, i.e., essential thrombocythemia [ET], polycythemia vera [PV] and myelofibrosis [MF]) can be significant and can negatively impact quality of life (QOL). Since patients with these MPNs can live for several years, thereby requiring long-term treatment and follow-up, nurses play an essential role in communicating with these patients, assessing their symptoms, and educating them on treatments and self-management strategies that can reduce their symptom burden. This article, which is the first of a two-part series, was developed to provide nurses and other healthcare professionals with a review of the diagnosis and treatment of the most common classical MPNs. The second article in this series (also available in this issue) will provide nurses with practical guidance for managing the symptom burden associated with MPNs in order to help enhance the overall health and well-being of patients living with these disorders.

Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy.

In myelofibrosis (MF), driver mutations in JAK2, MPL, or CALR impact survival and progression to blast phase, with the greatest risk conferred by triple-negative status. Subclonal mutations, including mutations in high-molecular risk (HMR) genes, such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, and SRSF2 have also been associated with inferior prognosis. However, data evaluating the impact of next-generation sequencing in MF patients treated with JAK1/2 inhibitors are lacking. Using a 54-gene myeloid panel, we performed targeted sequencing on 100 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib (n = 77) or momelotinib (n = 23) and correlated mutational profiles with treatment outcomes. Ninety-nine patients had at least 1 mutation identified, 46 (46%) had 2 mutations, and 34 (34%) patients had ≥3 mutations. Seventy-nine patients carried a mutation in JAK2V617F, 14 patients had mutations in CALR, 6 patients had an MPL mutation, and 2 patients were triple negative. No mutation was significantly associated with spleen or anemia response. A high Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score and pretreatment transfusion dependence were associated with a shorter time to treatment failure (TTF), and this association retained significance on multivariable analysis. Patients with ASXL1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; P = .03) and EZH2 mutations (HR, 2.94; P = .009) and an HMR profile (HR, 2.06; P = .01) had shorter TTF. On multivariate analysis, ASXL1 or EZH2 mutations were independently associated with shorter TTF and overall survival. These findings help identify patients unlikely to have a durable response with current JAK1/2 inhibitors and provide a framework for future studies.